A claim on your own website counts for little. The same claim across several independent sources is what gets an AI to repeat it.
Coverage and mentions across the sources language models already trust, so the same claim about your client appears in several independent places rather than only on their own site.
The same verifiable facts about your business repeated across independent sources. That is what models weight.
Industry publications, niche forums, Reddit, directories and YouTube transcripts, not just blogs.
Name, service area, trade and credentials matched everywhere a model might crawl them.
We log which prompts surface your brand across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and AI Overviews, monthly.
We run a set of target prompts and record where the brand appears today, if at all.
Consistent naming, schema and profile data across every surface a model reads.
Mentions and coverage across independent sources carrying the same facts.
Same prompt set monthly, so you can see movement rather than take it on faith.
Tell us the trade, the service areas and what you have already tried. We'll come back with a scoped approach and a price, or tell you to spend the money elsewhere first.
Partly, and we will be straight with you about the limits. Entity consistency and third-party corroboration demonstrably change whether a model names a business. Anyone selling a guaranteed GEO playbook is guessing. We treat it as measurable and show you the prompt tracking.
They help less than links for rankings, and more than links for AI citation. Run them alongside link building rather than instead of it.
A fixed prompt set run monthly across the major assistants, logging whether the brand appears, in what position and with what context. Same questions every month so the trend means something.
For rankings, less than a link. For whether an assistant names your business, more. Models weigh how often a claim appears across independent sources far more than whether those sources linked. Run mentions alongside link building, not instead of it.
Longer than you would like. Retrieval-based surfaces such as Perplexity and AI Overviews can pick up new sources within weeks. Anything that depends on training data moves on the model's schedule, not ours. We report monthly so you can see which is happening.
That is the useful finding, and the prompt tracking exists to catch it. We look at what the model cited for that answer, then work on getting the same facts about you into comparable sources. It is slower than it sounds, and we will not pretend otherwise.
For the entity and schema work, yes, or a developer on your side who can ship what we specify. The mention building itself happens off your site, so it can start while access is being arranged.